Nestlé's move from Croydon to Gatwick leaves caterers in hot water
ANGRY catering staff at Nestlé say they will be forced to pay over £2,500 in travel bills when the firm moves to Gatwick.
The team of 17 – who serve 800 of the firm's staff in the restaurant – are in dispute with new contractor Baxter Storey over the relocation plans next month.
-

"ABSOLUTE DISGRACE": Union rep Nick Day is fighting for catering workers at Nesté Photo by David Cook
Nestlé announced in January that it was leaving Croydon after 45 years, moving its headquarters to new premises close to Gatwick Airport.
The catering team say Baxter Storey has told them they will be dismissed without redundancy pay if they do not fund their extra travel costs.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Wednesday, May 22 2013
The employees are a group of predominantly female workers – many part-time – some of whom earn less than £7 an hour.
The move, from St George's House in Park Lane, is taking place on October 1, the same day the catering contract is being transferred from ISS Ltd to Baxter Storey.
One worker within the catering team, who the Advertiser has agreed not to name, said: "When we took these positions we took them based on the location. Now we're being asked to transfer 20 miles away.
"Some of the team physically can't do the journey because of childcare issues. We're going to be leaving home earlier, coming home later, and getting less pay.
"There's been this PR gloss about the wonderful building they're moving to, but we're going to lose £2,500.
"We have members of staff that have been here 25 years."
Our source said the close-knit group of staff felt they were between "a rock and a hard place".
The workers deal with hospitality events in the building and said they worked to "deliver the best possible service".
The GMB union is seeking an urgent meeting with Baxter Storey.
GMB organising officer Nick Day said: "It is an absolute disgrace that low-paid female workers are to be moved to a site 20 miles away at a cost to themselves of over £2,500 per year. Indeed, many will incur a childcare cost due to the extra travel time."
A Nestlé spokesman said: "As this is a matter between ISS and Baxter Storey we are unable to comment."
ISS Ltd did not wish to comment at this stage and Baxter Storey had not provided a comment as the Advertiser went to press.




Comments
by Daizichainz
Thursday, September 27 2012, 9:07AM
“These members of staff will be transfered to Baxter Storey via TUPE, meaning new employer has to honour old employers contract. The employees need to look at their contracts of employment and see if there is a mobility clause written into it. If there is the staff will probably have to shoulder the costs, however a mobility clause can be gotten around as the law sometimes doesn't accept them and sees them as unacceptable i.e. It would be unreasonable to expect staff to move to Scotland for instance. Mobility clause just makes your cause a whole lot more difficult it doesn't mean your cause is lost, you do however have to prove that the mobility clause is unreasonalbe. If there isn't a mobility clause, most firms offer a relocation package which involves some form of incentives and/or remuneration if they do not and you can prove this move is unreasonalbe/feesible due to loss of money, time, need to move house and/or family commitments and cannot talk your employers round to remuneration you are entitled to redundancy. The law is on your side, mobility clause or not, look into it and good luck”
by roomster
Thursday, September 27 2012, 8:57AM
“This is always a problem when organisations relocate the ancillary staff are often forgotten and lets be truthful many are ignored because the employer knows that they can replace them locally. Loyalty to employee's is often lacking these days the term Human Resources says a lot about what employers really think about it's employees these days.”
by swsquires1
Thursday, September 27 2012, 8:50AM
“jackhall1, sadly big business never operates like that any more (or very rarely). Being cynical, Nestle care about the lowest price possible for the required service. From a corporate level their contract is with baxter and they don't really care who baxter provides to do the job. This is backed up by the comment provided by Nestle's spokesman.
I am not a fan of unions, but in this case I am glad that one is involved. Sadly for part time staff, it is unlikely that pay will be increased to cover such a high incremental cost. In fact, you may even find that wages are slightly lower in the Crawley area. I would have thought that employment rights and benefits would be transferred across when the move from ISS to Baxter took place, so it is outragous to say leave and you get nothing.
At a minimum they should be offered generous redundancy but ultimately everything depends on their employment contracts. A quick search on google using "rights if relocated for work" provides a whole host of useful links and information. It appears that the key is whether your contract has a 'mobility clause'.
Good luck to the workers and I hope things are sorted in their favour. Sadly, I do not see this resulting in increased pay to move to Gatwick. An annual season ticket from East Croydon to Gatwick is currently £2,196 pa. Obviously this comes out of net pay so a larger increase required to cover it.”
by jackhall1
Thursday, September 27 2012, 8:07AM
“nestle should step in and inform baxter storey that if this dispute is not sorted to the catering staffs advantage they will lose the contract and the staff will be employed in-house the alternative will be baxter storey employing third rate catering staff who have to be constantly told to wash there hands after using the toilet jackhall1”