New Addington couple prosecuted after cat found with hole in its face

Trusted article source icon
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Profile image for This is Croydon

This is Croydon

by Aline Nassif

aline.nassif@essnmedia.co.uk

A man who failed to spot his cat's face had eroded so badly its nose was missing claims the decision to prosecute him was a "load of rubbish".

Michael Barnes and wife Diane were found guilty last Friday of allowing Ginger, a 10-year-old tom cat, to be subjected to unnecessary suffering.

The New Addington couple, both 63, adopted the stray cat five years ago, shortly after their former black cat Sammy died.

But last summer they passed off a rare flesh-eating skin disease that developed into cancer as a "scab", and the animal had to be put down.

After being found guilty at Croydon Magistrates' Court Mr Barnes remained defiant, calling the £1,430 in fines and compensation imposed by magistrates "daylight robbery".

He maintains that he and his wife "never hurt the cat on purpose".

"We love animals and we took in that stray because it sort of adopted us and wanted to be fed," he said.

"I can't believe we're being punished for looking after an animal that wasn't ours to start with, out of the goodness of our hearts.

"We genuinely thought the problem with its face was a scab from fighting other cats.

"There's no way either me or my wife would willfully try to harm an animal. We've had pets all our lives and we've never had any problems before."

It was the first time either Mr Barnes or his wife had ever been in court.

"It's been the most degrading and humiliating experience ever and it has really affected our health," former surveyor Mr Barnes said.

"The courts and the RSPCA have done us a great injustice. They are just out to get every penny they can.

"I'm disgusted that our good name has been muddied over something we never intended to do."

The couple are now banned from keeping animals for five years.

Although Mr Barnes is protesting their innocence, RSPCA inspector Lynn Marshall says it was the "worst case" of animal cruelty she has ever seen.

She visited their home in Gascoigne Road on July 22 last year after a concerned member of the public reported "a cat with a hole in its face".

"The cat was obviously in a lot of pain and suffered," Miss Marshall said.

Ginger was found to have the rare skin condition Bowen's disease which developed into cancer.

By the time it reached vet Sarah Pitt-Bailey's operating table, there was no option but to put him down.

When sentencing them, chairman of the bench Ray Stibbards said: "The vet should have been seen earlier when treatment should have been given. It should have been obvious."

The couple were each fined £150 for the offence, ordered to pay £550 compensation to the RSPCA and a £15 victim surcharge.

13
Tweet this article
Report

13 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by chelle, addo

    Saturday, May 23 2009, 8:12PM

    “the rspca officer who said it was the worst case of cruelty she'd seen obviously hasnt been in the job long.”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by xcv, selsdon

    Friday, May 22 2009, 12:10PM

    “If he's a former surveyor, he surely has the intelligence and observation skills to notice the cat was missing half his face. They would probably have qualified for free veterinary care from the PDSA as well.

    No excuse for this - he deserved to be punished more.”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by dave, croydon

    Monday, May 18 2009, 11:37PM

    “That cats got no nose

    How does it smell?

    Well. . . Insert punchline here”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by ....., ......

    Monday, May 18 2009, 8:58PM

    “The3rd, Croydon

    an animal might not be worth much to you...but to alot of us they are better then humans”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by The3rd, Croydon

    Monday, May 18 2009, 12:37PM

    “You would lay your own human life on the line for a cat??!

    Ive heard it all now!”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by Joe, Croydon

    Sunday, May 17 2009, 7:34PM

    “No,I don't keep vermin.”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by ....., ......

    Sunday, May 17 2009, 7:01PM

    “But last summer they passed off a rare flesh-eating skin disease that developed into cancer as a "scab", and the animal had to be put down.

    This cat had cancer, would you prolong its life, and let him suffer.”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by Joe, Croydon

    Sunday, May 17 2009, 12:21PM

    “So Michael and Diana Barnes give a home to a stray cat,and then a Vet kills it,not sure the fine was given to the correct person.”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by ....., ......

    Sunday, May 17 2009, 9:45AM

    “this cat was once a stray yes, but then this couple had taken the cat in..which means this cat was no longer a stray and there responsibility. By not taking the cat to the vet earlier enough..its called neglect..(before a problem becomes worse)”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by lloyd, N.Addington

    Sunday, May 17 2009, 9:29AM

    “Technically the cat didn't belong to anybody so surly this fine is wrong the cat was a stray cat that this couple took in. I know its a bad story to see a cat suffer in this way. But I think the court pulled a dodgy one here??”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters