Residents will pay the price with health issues
Shasha Khan, leader of Croydon Green Party, who handcuffed himself in town hall in protest of the incinerator, said: "The devil in the detail is money and profit. This year the tax on sending biodegradable waste to landfill is £56 per tonne. Over the next three years it will rise by £8 per tonne per year. The projected tax bill is the stick forcing councils to find alternatives: Incinerators.
"For the dioxins to be broken down safely the incinerator needs to operate at more than 1400C. This incinerator will almost certainly operate at a lower temperature to make it more cost effective.
-

NO WAY: Shasha Khan
"This means that there is a far greater risk of harmful emissions that cause birth defects, raised infant mortality rates, lung disease and cancer released into the air that we breathe.
"The Health Protection Agency's own report on modern incinerators clearly states it is not possible to rule out adverse effects.
"Waste reduction can be improved by reusing, recycling and composting. However, in south London we will be burning waste. Once built, you need to feed the beast over the lifetime of the 25-year contract, which is why incineration leads to stagnation in recycling. Reuse and recycling centres create ten times more jobs per tonne of waste than incinerators.
"It is important to remember that a huge part of Croydon is downwind from Beddington Lane.
"It seems that Croydon residents will be paying the price in health problems for burning waste from four London boroughs.
"One Tory councillor in Merton told us, if they tried to build an incinerator in Wimbledon Village, they would be facing a £100 million lawsuit."







9 Comments
by SMOGBAD
Sunday, January 01 2012, 7:02AM
“The radioactive waste stream planned is very worrying.The effects of alpha emitting dusts have been ignored since Hiroshima:
I just want to reiterate why infants and children are so vulnerable to "fallout" of all kinds:
• Their small body weight means they get a much higher dose/kilo (5lbs versus adult 150 lbs) of any contamination
• Their gut absorbs radionucleotides X100 more than an adult:
• they have very many rapidly dividing cells which means they many more at the stage sensitive to irreparable DNA damage (TP just before G2)
• Thyroxine is a vital co-hormone in very many metabolic processes,so its reduction due to I 131 induced thyroid damage is a much more crucial issue for the infant.
• The immunological system is immature and inefficient (vulnerable to infection and poor at repair processes)
• Liver enzyme systems have not developed well enough to cope with any extra detoxification needed
Other issues include the replacement of Caesium 137 ( gamma ray emission from Ba intermediate) for potassium and strontium 90 ( beta decay and from Ytrium[more energetic]) for calcium in heart membrane depolarisation and conductive pathway conduction and muscle contractions respectively.
Because radiation safety standards are set based on the assumption that everyone exposed is a healthy man in his 20's, and that radioactive particles ingested into the body cause no more damage than radiation hitting the outside of the body. However in the real world radiation affects small children much more than adults and small particles of radiation called "internal emitters" which get inside the body are much more dangerous than general exposures to radiation. American and Canadian authorities have virtually stopped monitoring airborne radiation, and are not testing fish for radiation. (Indeed, the EPA reacted to Fukushima by raising "acceptable" radiation levels. So , as in Japan , radiation is usually discovered by citizens and the handful of research scientists with funding to check, and not the government. The Japanese government's entire strategy from day one has been to cover up the severity of the Fukushima accident and this has likely led to unnecessary, additional deaths. Indeed, the core problem is that all of the world's nuclear agencies are wholly captured by the nuclear industry … as are virtually all of the supposedly independent health agencies. So the failure of the American, Canadian and other governments to test for and share results is making it difficult to hold an open scientific debate about what is happening.”
by tbabygib
Sunday, December 25 2011, 4:20PM
“I'd Best start saying my Goodbyes Now then.......:)”
by Ivor_Shed
Sunday, December 25 2011, 1:57PM
“Life expectancy living rough is only 47. If you live rough in Addo then I guess you don't live long past school leaving age - although school/college leaving age does keep going up!”
by tbabygib
Sunday, December 25 2011, 12:22AM
“Oh, goodness me, 7 times less likely to live, to older age.? should I move ? No not at all I will take my chances. I Love living here its a lovely place to live, poor or not, everyone has a cup of sugar for their neighbour. Council people do not dump on us Please.”
by msbloggs
Sunday, December 25 2011, 12:00AM
“Nicely said halfatalkrate.
Natural change is ok. But when you get people doing things that could harm peoples lives to save money is something else. Hope they have a re-think.”
by Pathfinders
Saturday, December 24 2011, 10:32PM
“So an incinerator will cause ill-health etc will it?
Once Mr Khan, and more importantly those statutory bodies that can make a difference appreciate that those living in New Addington and Fieldway (identified as 2 of the most deprived in the Borough) are already living on average 7 years less than other areas such as Addington Village, literally across the road - perhaps then this will be more of an issue to all.”
by tbabygib
Friday, December 23 2011, 6:11PM
“"Windy" I was just going to say your spelling Is worse then mine, But Understood what you said even so. I don't know this person, seems you do, but your comment vanished as quick as it appeared. Maybe try again with different wording.!”
by HalfaTalkrate
Friday, December 23 2011, 3:14PM
“@ nicecityboy - and sometimes we have to fight change that is for the worse.
The NIMBYs are the Croydon Conservative Council Cabinet members, none of whom live downwind of the incinerator they promised us they wouldn't build, either in Croydon or on its doorstep.”
by nicecityboy
Friday, December 23 2011, 10:23AM
“NIMBY.
Sometimes we have to accept change and get on with it.”