Waste incinerator on Croydon border "almost inevitable" politician claims

Trusted article source icon
Friday, May 22, 2009
Profile image for This is Croydon

This is Croydon

by Neil Millard

neil.millard@essnmedia.co.uk

A waste incinerator on the Croydon border is "almost inevitable" and could endanger the health of the borough's children, it was claimed this week.

The South London Waste Partnership (SLWP) - of which Croydon Council is a member - needs to find a way of cutting the amount of rubbish it is sending to landfill.

Over the next two years private firms will be asked to come up with potential solutions to the SLWP's waste problem.

Croydon and Sutton councils have given assurances that there are alternatives to incineration, but Croydon's Green Party spokesman Shasha Khan is unconvinced.

He started collecting signatures for a petition this week, which he hopes will show the weight of objection to an incinerator.

Mr Khan believes the most likely site for a south London incinerator is Beddington Sewage Treatment Works, just over the Sutton border.

If one is built he says it will put the health of the borough's residents - and in particular children - at greater risk.

"Incineration is their only option," he said.

"They have got no alternative to sending it to landfill. We have ended up in a situation where we have got to burn it.

"It's going to suddenly appear. It has got to be stopped."

As incinerators generally have 100 foot tall chimneys, Mr Khan believes Beddington is the likely site as it has the room and is not surrounded by residential properties.

But, he claims, plenty of locals' lives would be blighted by an incinerator.

"It won't be built in Croydon - that doesn't mean Croydon won't be affected," he said.

"A study in Coventry has shown that infant mortality was affected when the wind blew in the direction of the communities concerned from an incinerator elsewhere."

The SLWP - made up of Croydon, Sutton, Merton and Kingston councils - has been awarded £113 million with which it must find a method of reducing the amount of waste going to landfill.

If an incinerator was chosen as that method, Mr Khan says it would produce a toxic cloud of pollutants.

"With the prevailing wind that cloud is going to be travelling in a north-easterly direction over Thornton Heath," he said.

"It will also go as far down as Sanderstead and all the way up to Herne Hill."

In February a bitter row erupted before the Waddon by-election, when Labour accused the Tories of plotting to build the incinerator.

The Tory leadership flatly denied the claims and still does.

Croydon waste chief Phil Thomas, slammed the Greens for scare-mongering.

He said: "These claims at the moment are absolute nonsense because no decisions have been made.

"I find it ridiculous that they are going around frightening people about incinerators.

"What we have agreed is that (the SLWP) will not have any of the things that we call incinerators. There is an alternative. There's tonnes of technology around."

Colin Hall, Sutton Council's waste chief, echoed this promise.

He said: "There are a number of technologies that may be used.

"The SLWP has no preference at this stage for any particular technology - what the partnership is clear on is that old-fashioned mass-burn incineration is not an option."

A decision is not expected on the technology to be used or its location until 2011.

Targets for the amount of waste going to landfill are being reduced year on year.

There are fears that by 2012/2013 Croydon Council could be sending nearly 20,000 tonnes too much rubbish to landfill.

By then for every one tonne the council exceeds Government targets by it will have to pay £150 in landfill tax.

If already implemented this would mean a bill of around £270,000 a year, which would fall on council taxpayers.

5
Tweet this article
Report

5 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by auto, Croydon - in the EU, sadly

    Friday, May 22 2009, 8:26PM

    “Recycvling, currently, is simply not on.
    As Mad notes, nobody wants the stuff.

    You can't export it to China,even.

    And, thanks to an EU Directive, you can't bury it.
    The benefits of Yurp!
    Not discussed by our poor hard-done-by MPs, down to their last £22,000 ACA! - but the law of the land.
    That - and their own appalling, cynical, criminal fiscal mis-management - is why Nu-lab has slapped a hefty Landill Tax on rubbish that is buried.

    So, yes, it look like - thanks to No-referendum Nu-Lab - Yurp has slapped an Incinerator on Croydon.

    And we get one go every four years to vote on the EU - or at least our representatives in Brussels. [And one week a month in France].

    Now is your chance.
    Take it.
    VOTE.”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by Mad, South Norwood

    Friday, May 22 2009, 5:35PM

    “Austen, what you say sounds all very good, but unfortunately it doesn't work. As the Times reported, since the economic collapse, recycling waste has to be stored in unused army bases and other facilities as prices have collapsed.

    timesonline. co. uk/tol/news/environment/article5093545.ece”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by Austen, London

    Friday, May 22 2009, 1:10PM

    “Councillor Phil Thomas complains that the Greens are frightening people about the prospect of an incinerator being built.

    He might be to blame there, for failing to consult and inform local people. Cllr Thomas represents Croydon Council on the South London Waste Partnership. Last week it invited companies to bid for a project that will include the building of an energy-from-waste plant with combined heat and power with a 106,500 tonne-a-year capacity. Other councils in the partnership ¿ Kingston, Sutton and Merton are comparatively open about this. For example, Sutton Council's website clearly displays information about the South London Waste Plan and invites local people to get involved. It's a struggle to find anything similar on Croydon's pages.

    While it is true that energy from waste does not automatically mean incineration, in practice it usually does. While the waste industry and its political friends like to talk about green electricity, incinerator power stations cause more problems than they solve.

    Croydon Council should not be considering joining an energy- from-waste consortium when it is failing to meet its recycling targets. It should categorically rule out turning local household rubbish into smoke, ash and heat. It should focus its efforts on meeting its recycling targets. For the rubbish that isn't recycled, they should considering the only true green energy from waste alternative, anaerobic digestion.

    Finally, Cllr Thomas and his party colleagues should engage in open, honest debate and genuine consultation, and stop trying to dismiss legitimate concerns about recycling, air pollution and climate change as scaremongering or downright lies (e.g. the Waddon by-election).

    By the way, well done to the Greens and the Advertiser for raising this issue - please keep it going, particularly in the run up to the council elections next May.”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by Mad, South Norwood

    Friday, May 22 2009, 12:42PM

    “will that mean that we will be able to get cheap energy and heating in Croydon ? Or will they just waste the energy produced by this thing ?”

  • Profile image for This is Croydon

    by SV, Croydon

    Friday, May 22 2009, 11:01AM

    “What a cheek this man has.

    He was saying that the incinerator was just Labour propaganda in February.

    Perhaps he has now read the council papers and the Tory Council application for government funding!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters